Being a high school teacher and as we, high school teachers,
are preparing to implement the Common Core State Standards, I have realized how
disappointed I am in the lack of emphasis on technology. In each grade level
there is only one small strand in regards to technology. For example, in the
11-12 grade area on both the writing standards and literacy standards for the
other core-academic areas, the technology strand states the following:
"Use technology, including the Internet, to produce, publish, and update
individual or shared writing products in response to ongoing feedback,
including new arguments or information" (www.corestandards.org). This
standard is extremely vague. Look at what the current grade level content
expectations have to say regarding technology (www.michigan.gov/mde):
- CE 1.5.2 Prepare spoken and multimedia presentations that effectively address audiences by careful use of voice, pacing, gestures, eye contact, visual aids, audio and video technology.
- CE 1.5.4 Use technology tools (e.g, word processing, presentation and multimedia software) to produce polished written and multimedia work (e.g., literary and expository works, proposals, business presentations, advertisements).
I did not realize how much this lack of detail as to what
students need to master before graduating high school bothered me until reading
Because Digital Writing Matters by Danielle DeVoss, Elyse Eidman-Aadahl, and
Troy Hicks. I have a secret passion for technology. I love incorporating
technology because I truly believe that students, more specifically high school
students, rely on technology, whether they really know it or not. From cell
phones to laptops to iPod touches, students are constantly enveloped in the
world of technology. If students do not have the opportunity to be exposed to
how technology can be used for the purposes of learning and improve their
writing, I fear that students will go through their high school lifetime being
illiterate in writing and technology.
In Because Digital Writing Matters, DeVoss, Eidman-Aadahl,
and Hicks state that writing instruction for today's students "requires
[the teachers] to consider what new skills and dispositions students might need
for the digital age" (11). However, if there are no specific guidelines
for teachers, how are teachers expected to know what type of technologies
should be introduced into the classroom?
This is what frustrates me with the Common Core State
Standards. The standard on technology seems unclear to me as to what the expectations
are for the both the teachers and students. Being that I love technology, I
would constantly be using it. However, would a teacher who is not as acquainted
and comfortable with technology use it less often or maybe not even at all? How
would this impact the students' education in regards to digital literacy and
the fact that digital writing is currently the new way of learning? I really
enjoy the input from DeVoss, Eidman-Aadahl, and Hicks, but how can it be
stressed to all teachers that they should have this same mindset on technology
and digital writing?
I'm not really sure how high school teaching works, but I wonder if maybe not having specific guidelines could actually work out as a positive thing in some way? In a college teaching environment, not having many specific guidelines allows instructors to have more freedom in class - such as deciding for themselves whether they want to use a wiki, or a blog, or teach students to use Powerpoint, or to use no technology at all. For me, that can be kind of rewarding, because it means I can always try out new things! Do you think it could work that way in K-12 education at all?
ReplyDeleteThis is Aylen from class, by the way. I don't know why my name is showing up differently all over the place! ...Sheesh!
Delete